|
overshadowed by the sizzle of the first Kennedy-Romney debate and the fizzle of the
second. The first debate produced electricity and drew national attention. The second
featured a compromise panel of "The People's Voice" and Herald
participants. The only
memorable moment was a personal attack on Kennedy, a hard question about drugs and
alcohol from George Riethof, the same Republican who asked a similar question during
the earlier Kennedy citizens panel. After the debate, the Globe
received calls and
letters criticizing the paper for selecting Riethof as a participant.
Detractors blamed the difference between the two debates on the town hall format of
the second one and criticized the questions for being ill-focused, too long, and too
distracting. Brown, who knew the format could be successful, attributed the problems
to a lack of panel preparation. "They weren't prepared. They need to be taught some
aspects of television," he said.
"Most of the reporters thought that debate was worthless. The voters thought it was
just fine," said the Globe's Robinson, who believed dull questions were
the only real
problem.
After each debate, the Globe called citizen panelists at home and
ran response
boxes the next day. The coverage of the second Kennedy-Romney debate !--#include virtuald a box
with reaction from the panelists.
< Back | Table of Contents | Forward >
[ Civic Catalyst Newsletter ]
[ Publications ]
[ Videos ]
[ Speeches &
Articles ] [ Research ]
[ Conferences & Workshops ] [ Spotlights ]
|