“This is an archived site of work by the Pew Center for Civic Journalism from 1994 to 2002. More about the Pew Center here: [About the Pew Center]. The Pew Center spun into J-Lab: the Institute for Interactive Journalism in 2002. [Home]. For more information, contact: [J-Lab ]”

This is an archived site of work by the Pew Center for Civic Journalism from 1994 to 2002. More about the Pew Center here. The Pew Center spun into J-Lab: the Institute for Interactive Journalism in 2002. For more information, contact us.

BOSTON, MASS.6

Herald participants. The only memorable moment was a personal attack on Kennedy, a hard question about drugs and alcohol from George Riethof, the same Republican who asked a similar question during the earlier Kennedy citizens panel. After the debate, the Globe received calls and letters criticizing the paper for selecting Riethof as a participant.

Detractors blamed the difference between the two debates on the town hall format of the second one and criticized the questions for being ill-focused, too long, and too distracting. Brown, who knew the format could be successful, attributed the problems to a lack of panel preparation. “They weren’t prepared. They need to be taught some aspects of television,” he said.

“Most of the reporters thought that debate was worthless. The voters thought it was just fine,” said the Globe‘s Robinson, who believed dull questions were the only real problem.

After each debate, the Globe called citizen panelists at home and ran response boxes the next day. The coverage of the second Kennedy-Romney debate !–#include virtuald a box with reaction from the panelists.

 

 

< Back | Table of Contents | Forward >